Re: 201.A

From: Factitious (bh003m_at_mail.rochester.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 10:17:14 PST

• Next message: Doug Chatham: "Paraconsistency"
• Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: 201.A"
• Maybe in reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "201.A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I vote FOR this proposal.

It seems to be clear enough, and it's certainly an
interesting twist.  Besides, it fits well with the theme.

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-01-23 18:17:24 GMT

• Next message: Doug Chatham: "Paraconsistency"
• Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: 201.A"
• Maybe in reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "201.A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST