From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 08:44:13 PST
Andre Engels <engels_at_uni-koblenz.de> writes: > I vote AGAINST this proposal, because I think it can lead to ill-defined > situations. What do we do when Rule A+B, rule B+C and rule A+C are all > consistent, but rule A+B+C is inconsistent? Let the Judge decide, and/or resolve it by Proposal, I suppose. It's a fairly unlikely scenario anyway. > Also, the first rule must (that much is clear) be inconsistent. But if the > first rule is in itself inconsistent, does that not also mean that every > other rule is inconsistent with it? Of course not. Example Rule 1: "All rules must be at least ten words long." -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2003-01-23 16:44:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST