From: Andre Engels (engels_at_uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 09:12:43 PST
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Alan Riddell wrote: > Ah yes I just assumed the outer circle was made from a double line... now I > see this is like a double negation, it instead is a prevention of a > prevention of frogs. How does this apply to narrowing? I could then > reinterpreted the entire rule as you should not runover frogs even if the > road narrows but, I doubt that would be the most useful interpretation for > the round... Maybe we should go back to your old interpretation of narrowing meaning smaller rules, something like: "Smaller rules may not forbid the mentioning of frogs"? Andre Engels -- Rule Date: 2003-02-27 17:20:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST