Re: 207.A

From: Nathan Russell (nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 28 2003 - 07:10:48 PDT


--On Monday, April 28, 2003 10:28 AM +0100 Jonathan David Amery 
<jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org> wrote:

>> Fourth, the incidence of spam is not high at all.
>
>  Of the last 350 messages I've received from the list, 113 are spam
> (30 are talking about spam).
>
>  1/3 of the lists traffic being spam is really quite high, at least
> for the lists I'm on...

Agreed...

By the way, could someone let me know the status of rules 2 through, I 
thinkm, 5?

I've been a bad judge and lost track.  

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-04-28 14:11:04 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST