From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 10:38:05 PDT
On 11 Apr 2003, Richard S. Holmes wrote: > "Jesse W" <jessw_at_netwood.net> writes: > > > On 9 Apr 2003,, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt_at_gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote: > > > a) I move you to a different address, using the same software except > > > with even stricter settings > > > > I vote for this. I don't _think_ it would cause too many problems... > > I likewise think this would be a Good Thing, though whether a vote is > called for I don't know... RO # 10: Where to Do Things. All actions under these rules must be accomplished by a public posting in the official committee forum. The Judge may determine the location and nature of the official committee forum. Come to think of it, this seems like an awful lot of power to give a judge. Hasn't this feature been abused in the past? May I suggest altering RO # 10 to declare the official committee forum as a specific mailing list? Either the one we're using, or the new one if we go that route. -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) -- Rule Date: 2003-04-11 17:38:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST