From: Andre Engels (engels_at_uni-koblenz.de)
Date: Tue Apr 01 2003 - 04:28:59 PST
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Alan Riddell wrote: > As such I reimpose the missing rescriction that 206:1 would impose. > > For this Round, each Rule must make exactly one claim that is false. As far as I can see, there is no provision in the ROs that allows the judge to impose restrictions. Furthermore, by re-imposing the restriction, you are making the statement TRUE, thus making the Rule inconsistent with itself. Andre Engels -- Rule Date: 2003-04-01 12:28:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST