From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 16:10:24 PST
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) wrote: > On 26 Nov 2002, Richard S. Holmes wrote: > > > "Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)" <jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com> writes: > > > > > Hmm... Well, we could probably spend the remainder of this round > > > discussing the intricacies of this rule. Is there a restriction in it that > > > I'm not seeing? I haven't decided yet... And how about that Chinese puzzle > > > box? Is it an unopened box that needs opening (197:03)? If it is, that's > > > quite a lengthy description to surpass (196:04). > > > > Or is it merely Unsuccessful? > > I don't believe 197:7 would be Unsuccessful, as I think it does meet the > requirements of 197:6 by exchanging the gift certificate from 197:5 for > some tangible goods. A complete co-incidence, I might add - I hadn't seen 197:6 when I submitted my Rule, as you can tell from my attempted numbering. -- Steve Gardner | Each writer creates their own School of Computer Science | precursors. and Software Engineering | gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au | -- Jorge Luis Borges -- Rule Date: 2002-11-27 00:12:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST