From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 08:09:32 PST
"Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)" <jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com> writes: > Hmm... Well, we could probably spend the remainder of this round > discussing the intricacies of this rule. Is there a restriction in it that > I'm not seeing? I haven't decided yet... And how about that Chinese puzzle > box? Is it an unopened box that needs opening (197:03)? If it is, that's > quite a lengthy description to surpass (196:04). Or is it merely Unsuccessful? -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2002-11-26 16:09:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST