Re: 197:6

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 08:09:32 PST


"Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)" <jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com> writes:

> Hmm... Well, we could probably spend the remainder of this round
> discussing the intricacies of this rule. Is there a restriction in it that
> I'm not seeing? I haven't decided yet... And how about that Chinese puzzle
> box? Is it an unopened box that needs opening (197:03)? If it is, that's
> quite a lengthy description to surpass (196:04).

Or is it merely Unsuccessful?

-- 
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY

-- 
Rule Date: 2002-11-26 16:09:46 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST