Re: Too late to join?

From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Tue Nov 12 2002 - 22:25:45 PST


On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Nathan Russell wrote:

> Is it too late to join this round?
>
> Also, could a Judge post the rules accepted so far?
>
> Thanks much!
>
> Nathan

I believe you have up to 7 days from the posting of the first rule to join
in the current round. That would mean you have until 2002-11-15 07:49:24
GMT to join in this round by posting your own rule.

As for the rules accepted so far this round, I have the following records.
Keep in mind that I'm not the judge though. 196:1, 196:2, 193:3, and 196:4
were judged valid. Both 196:5 and 196:6 were judged invalid. Rules 196:7
and 196:8 have not been judged yet. Here are the rules that have been
judged valid:


Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 23:47:38 -0800
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com>
To: FRC <frc_at_trolltech.com>
Subject: 196:1

There were rounds when, three or four rules in, I didn't have a clue what
was going on any more.  Those were the good times.  Then there was the
Bribery round when, seven or eight rules in, hardly anybody had a clue
what was going on any more.  That was sort of a bad time, except for the
Judge and eir crony.

Each future eulogy (er, rule) shall suggest a new way to save FRC from
assuming room temperature.  (Turn it into a Points Contest in Agora
Nomic?)


--
Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com>          "I'm not sure I can go through
http://members.fortunecity.com/emurphy/      with it.  Leave, I mean."

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-08 07:49:24 GMT


Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 10:34:17 -0500
From: "Leonhard, Christian" <Christian_Leonhard_at_ADP.com>
To: "'frc_at_trolltech.com'" <frc_at_trolltech.com>
Subject: 196:2

Three score and thrice three rounds ago, Nostradamus predicted the end
times of the FRC. Just because he was correct in forseeing that each
eulogist in this round would remind us of a round from happier times,
though, must we docilely don our shrouds and lay ourselves, still living,
in the ground? I have roused myself from my torpor to say you nay, and
remain convinced that if we can but decipher the F'rcyeh Tablets, we can
save ourselves with the secrets contained therein.

Christian R. Leonhard



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.

If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an
authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments
from your system.

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-08 15:34:39 GMT


Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:02:20 +0000
From: Jonathan David Amery <jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org>
To: FRC <frc_at_trolltech.com>
Subject: 196:3

Being a numerologist this round has a very pleasing number, being the
square of 14.  14 is, itself, the product of the numbers of the first
two remaining archived rounds (at ftp.nvg.ntnu.no).  So, I recommend
that we should eschew he sillyness of limerics, as 2 is a strange
prime, but instead follow round 7's lead and make all eulogies shorter
than those before them, and hope to extend the FRC by minimising the
space it takes up.

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-08 16:02:41 GMT


Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 13:12:57 -0000
From: Alan Riddell <peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk>
To: frc <frc_at_trolltech.com>
Subject: 196:4

Ah, remember the good old days when we could look back on the dirt and
filth of previous rounds without the rose tinited sepcticals of nostalga.
>From now on Rules shall make reference to a previous round, such as the
unforgettable round with the board, which sadly I cant remeber the number
of... What is it again?

Alan "Peekee" Riddell

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-10 13:13:07 GMT

--
Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-13 06:32:36 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST