From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Mon Nov 11 2002 - 23:56:35 PST
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Tieka wrote: > Ah, remember the good old days when we could look back on the dirt and > filth of previous rounds without the rose tinited sepcticals of > nostalga. From now on Rules shall make reference to a previous round, > such as the unforgettable round with the board, which sadly I cant > remeber the number of... What is it again? > > Alan "Peekee" Riddell > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-11-10 13:13:07 GMT > ------------ > Let's see here, we have nostaglia which is good for eulogies, but we > seem to be lacking any way to improve FRC before it's untimley death. > Nor does it follow the suggestion of deciphering the F'rcyeh Tablets. It > is shorter than previous suggestions, so it has followed one of the > suggestions. It does contain a much stronger restriction on future > rules, so I won't be forced to interpet another suggestion. Since Alan > has already publicly admitted his spelling problem I don't feel it > necessary to further penalize him. I am very pleased with the reference > to things nobody understands. Over all I give this rule +1.5 > > Tieka, > Wizard, Judge, and a lot more stuff > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-11-12 01:30:45 GMT Please forgive me if I'm wrong here, as I'm still a relative newcomer to FRC. Shouldn't 196:4 be declared invalid since it doesn't follow the requirement of 196:1? -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) -- Rule Date: 2002-11-12 08:03:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST