From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Fri May 31 2002 - 11:44:26 PDT
"Jonathan Van Matre" <JVanMatre_at_oslp.com> writes: > I hereby rescinde Proposal 185:C and in its stead, propose 185:D as > follows... > > PROPOSED: For the duration of Round 185, The Judge shall > have the authority to change eir ruling on any rule, and the > style points awarded to that rule, at any time and for any reason. > > ARGUMENT: It is expected (although not explicitly required, and > deliberately so) that the Judge will not do so arbitrarily, but within > the constraints of Rule 185:1. This is to facilitate a changing player > "reputation" which is synonymous with the style score, and allow players > to invalidate each other's rules by noting errors in them, thereby > setting up a climate in which accusations of libel, slander, and > defamation may run rampant. See Rule 185:1 for > a more detailed explanation. Votes on Proposal 185:D: FOR: "Jonathan Van Matre" <JVanMatre_at_oslp.com> rsholmes_at_mailbox.syr.edu (Richard S. Holmes) "Alan Riddell" <peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk> Factitious <x40_at_pacbell.net> AGAINST: (none) Proposal 185:D PASSES. -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2002-05-31 18:44:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST