Re: 179 - final summary

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 09:39:13 PST

• Next message: Aron Wall: "Re: rules that reinterpret past rules"
• Previous message: Mary K. Kuhner: "rules that reinterpret past rules"
• In reply to: James Willson: "Re: 179 - final summary"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 179 - final summary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

James Willson wrote:

> --- Aron Wall <aron_at_wall.org> wrote:
> > James Willson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Um, ok.
> > >
> > > Bravo to me, the judge of a more than usually daunting round!  :)
> > >
> >
> > I meant the announcement that the round is over.  This you know, yet I
> > feel obliged to write this anyways.  I am entirely in favor of praising
> > the Judge for judging an unusually difficult round.  But I rather
> > imagine that the round is not, in fact, over.  (And, for all we know,
> > the Judge need not have judged any more than one rule at this point ;-)
> > )
> >
> > Did Richard really think that I would fall for this?
> >
> > Aron Wall
> >
> > --
> > Rule Date: 2002-03-26 07:51:52 GMT
>
> Well I did send out a Final Summary with my name on it.

Really! Can I have it?  I never recieved any message with that content.

Aron Wall

--
Rule Date: 2002-03-26 17:38:48 GMT

• Next message: Aron Wall: "Re: rules that reinterpret past rules"
• Previous message: Mary K. Kuhner: "rules that reinterpret past rules"
• In reply to: James Willson: "Re: 179 - final summary"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 179 - final summary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST