Re: 187:7

From: Mark Nau (nau_at_treyarch.com)
Date: Wed Jun 26 2002 - 15:43:09 PDT

Next message: Jesse Welton: "187:5 VALID -1"
Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "187:7"
In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "187:7"
Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "187:7 INVALID +2"
Reply: Jesse Welton: "187:7 INVALID +2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

A version of the correct reply would have you look at its first four
letters. What does that mean? Ignore that. That's not my riddle. But
future answers should also disguise themselves.

I seem to have lost my train of thought. Sorry. A riddle, a
riddle...OK.

It is tension without a head, and what I get when I am put into a
confused rant.

--
-M
mailto:nau_at_treyarch.com

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-26 22:43:33 GMT

Next message: Jesse Welton: "187:5 VALID -1"
Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "187:7"
In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "187:7"
Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "187:7 INVALID +2"
Reply: Jesse Welton: "187:7 INVALID +2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST