From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Mon Jun 24 2002 - 22:06:16 PDT
Joshua wrote: > --- James Willson <jkvw3_at_yahoo.com> wrote: > > --- Joshua <j3b4_at_yahoo.com> wrote: > > > were not sure who they were supporting. My judgement is that all > > > players recieve an extra style point if they were known to be on a > > > winning team. > > > > Eh? > > > > I Don't think we have enough information to determine how the game > > ended. > > > > Sure, some parts of the game were documented, but we have no reason > > to > > assume that nothing else happened in the game. > > > > Also, do the RO's really allow you to give out "extra" style points? > > I'm certainly open to discussion on this point. I suggested that I > would do this when I ruled on 186:2 and no one objected. However the > argument I had prepared then was that I am not actually giving out > "extra" style points but delaying the awarding of points to committee > members who wittily contrive to be on the "winning" team. RO7 limits > style points to +/-3 for each rule posted, but does not specify when or > to whom those points must be awarded. In a four rule game I considered > myself allowed a budget of +/-12 points to be distributed by any > criteria I saw fit for such awards. Now that I look back at the R.O's on this issue, they are somewhat ambiguous, but no one has ever assigned the style points for a rule to anyone but the author of that rule. Do people really think that that is allowed? Aron Wall -- Rule Date: 2002-06-25 05:05:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST