Re: Proposal 185:E

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Tue Jun 04 2002 - 12:34:54 PDT

• Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:11"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:11"
• Maybe in reply to: Glenn & Chrystal Overby: "Proposal 185:E"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Glenn & Chrystal Overby <guardcaptain_at_earthlink.net> writes:

> <proposal>
> The Committee declares Rule 185:9 to be Sucky, and requests that the Judge deal
> with it in accordance with the Rules.
> </proposal>
>
> I vote FOR this proposal, while still laughing...
>
> Glenn E. Overby II
> Tilton, Illinois, USA
>
> =====
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~guardcaptain/
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-06-01 19:20:05 GMT

Votes FOR:

Glenn & Chrystal Overby <guardcaptain_at_earthlink.net>
"Alan Riddell" <peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk>

Votes AGAINST:

Mark Nau <nau_at_treyarch.com>

The proposal passes.  Rule 185:9 is Sucky.  Of course, it's already
INVALID.

--
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-04 19:35:21 GMT

• Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 185:11"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:11"
• Maybe in reply to: Glenn & Chrystal Overby: "Proposal 185:E"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST