Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Jun 04 2002 - 08:55:14 PDT

• Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Next in thread: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Reply: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"Richard S. Holmes" wrote:

>
> Very off topic, but in fact "only A if B" is ungrammatical

Why?

Aron Wall

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-04 15:55:14 GMT

• Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Next in thread: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Reply: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST