Re: 185:9: INVALID, +2.0

From: Alan Riddell (peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 14:23:21 PDT


> We reach the same conclusion by different roads.  The text is
>
>   ...any future rule they do post can only be VALID if the style
>   points awarded for that rule are negative.
>
> and I take "if" in its strictly Boolean sense, i.e. "A if B" is true
> if and only if (B is false) or (B is true and A is true).  In this
> interpretation no causal dependence is required: the restriction is
> obeyed for any rule which is not both VALID and possessed of positive
> style.

A little of topic here but "only A if B" is not the same as "A if B", and is
actually the same as "if A then B" or "A only if B".

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-03 21:19:40 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST