Re: Proposal 185:E

From: Alan Riddell (peekee_at_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2002 - 15:50:32 PDT

• Next message: Mark Nau: "Re[2]: Proposal 185:E"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:7: VALID, -0.2"
• In reply to: Glenn & Chrystal Overby: "Proposal 185:E"
• Next in thread: Mark Nau: "Re[2]: Proposal 185:E"
• Reply: Mark Nau: "Re[2]: Proposal 185:E"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn & Chrystal Overby" <guardcaptain_at_earthlink.net>
To: "FRC List" <>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 8:19 PM
Subject: Proposal 185:E


> <proposal>
> The Committee declares Rule 185:9 to be Sucky, and requests that the Judge
deal
> with it in accordance with the Rules.
> </proposal>
>
> I vote FOR this proposal, while still laughing...
>
> Glenn E. Overby II
> Tilton, Illinois, USA
>
> =====
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~guardcaptain/
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-06-01 19:20:05 GMT

I vote for this proposal.

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-01 22:46:49 GMT

• Next message: Mark Nau: "Re[2]: Proposal 185:E"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 185:7: VALID, -0.2"
• In reply to: Glenn & Chrystal Overby: "Proposal 185:E"
• Next in thread: Mark Nau: "Re[2]: Proposal 185:E"
• Reply: Mark Nau: "Re[2]: Proposal 185:E"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST