Re: 176:3 INVALID, -1.5

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Thu Jan 31 2002 - 05:16:21 PST


Stephen Turner <sret1_at_ntlworld.com> writes:

> Judgement: A tough one to judge but I'm calling it invalid. The problem is
> the "ISO-6842". 6842 = 9000 base 10, and ISO 9000 is a well-known standard
> about business processes and quality control. Nothing to do with alphabets
> at all.

The ROs require Fantasy Rules to be consistent with the ROs and with
previous valid Fantasy Rules.  Nothing requires them to be consistent
with reality.  Hence the word Fantasy.

I recommend the Judge reverse eir decision on this one.

--
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY

--
Rule Date: 2002-01-31 13:16:46 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST