174 over?

From: Stephen Turner (sret1_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 11:15:54 PST

• Next message: Jonathan Van Matre: "RE: 174 over?"
• Previous message: Glenn Overby II: "174:5: VALID +1.25"
• Next in thread: Jonathan Van Matre: "RE: 174 over?"
• Maybe reply: Jonathan Van Matre: "RE: 174 over?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Was there a rule after 174:5? If not, it looks to me like round 174 petered
out with JVM the Wizard Judge for the next round.

--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01

--
Rule Date: 2002-01-15 19:16:16 GMT

• Next message: Jonathan Van Matre: "RE: 174 over?"
• Previous message: Glenn Overby II: "174:5: VALID +1.25"
• Next in thread: Jonathan Van Matre: "RE: 174 over?"
• Maybe reply: Jonathan Van Matre: "RE: 174 over?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST