Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0

From: Alan Riddell (pkpeekee_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 14:42:28 PST

Next message: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Maybe in reply to: Stephen Turner: "176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Next in thread: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Reply: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Reply: Factitious: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>Judgement: I interpret "all numbers in base 11" in 176:1 to imply that all
>numbers must be written in digits. But this rule contains the words "zero"
>and "one". (cf "must each contain at least 1 fantasy number" in your first
>rule).

I you had to read 1 + 0 aloud what would you say? The multiplicative
indentity plus the additive identity???

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

--
Rule Date: 2002-02-06 22:42:50 GMT

Next message: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Maybe in reply to: Stephen Turner: "176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Next in thread: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Reply: Stephen Turner: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Reply: Factitious: "Re: 176:9 INVALID, -1.0"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST