Re: 176:7 INVALID, -2.0

From: Stephen Turner (sret1_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 07:13:26 PST


On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, James Willson wrote:
>
> I don't think 1=0 implies that 2=1 in fantasy maths.
> After all, it would only take a rule saying "oh, addition doesn't work that
> way" to make inequality work.

Well, that's possible, I suppose. But I think you would have a hard time
making that consistent with all the previous rules, in which addition looks
a lot like normal addition.

--
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01

--
Rule Date: 2002-02-05 15:13:54 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST