Re: 192:9 Invalid -3.0! You incompetant FOOL!!!

From: Joshua (j3b4_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Aug 28 2002 - 21:24:50 PDT


--- the Judge <thejudge_at_alemail.com> wrote:
> That's right.
>
> That rule preventing me (er I mean another player from posting a
> round killer is like TOTALLY BOgus!
>
> Mu heh heh eh eh ehhhe heheh @@!
>
> Thats it.
> So here's 192:9
>
> All future rules must not be valid, Er I mean no more futures will be
> validly posted...   Uh, i MEAN.. Damn you never told me hoew to werd
> it.
>
> Gulp I aint talking to nobody.
>
> Anyways the poiint of this rule is just to say the The JUdge is now
> the winner and ther aint nothing  you goody goody legal beagles can
> do about it. So there!
>
> BYE.
>
> the JUDGE.
>
>
> p.s. i HERBY ANNOUNCE MY INTENTION to join the funtasy rules
> committee!
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Get your free email from http://www.alemail.com
>
> Powered by Outblaze
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-08-28 14:25:13 GMT

IN-F***ING-VALID!!
Style -9999.9 (+9996.9 for not me being allowed to deduct more)= -3.0

T.J. you are the most pathetic sniveling excuse for an accomplice!
Never before in the history of all committee coups had any judge of my
brilliance been so hobbled by such worthless assistants!

Never mind the fact that you idiotically blew your cover by praising me
needlessly for a perfectly regular invalidation of 192:7, never mind
that you rule was written with such an atrocious lack of style as to me
nearly illegible, this aside you failed to observe even a single
restriction imposed my previous rules thus making it impossible for me
to declare your rule valid.  Furthermore you wrote a restriction so
muddled as to be completely useless. I'm sure you were told exactly
what to write. There was no need for embellishment and no excuse for
confusion.

As it turns out all of that idiocy was made irrelevant by your ultimate
failure to post you simply stinking rule before your eligibility
expired, which it did, HOURS before you got around to posting!

You are such a disgrace that were it in the judge's power to do so -
and I just might make such a proposal - I would ban you from ever
showing your stupid face (er email alias) in this forum again.

P.S. (to the committee): I absolutely and categorically deny any or all
allegations that I may in fact be the same person as the bumbling fool
calling himself theJudge.


______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca

--
Rule Date: 2002-08-29 04:24:57 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST