From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 23:27:49 PST
Ed Murphy wrote: > Aron Wall <aron_at_wall.org> wrote: > > > > >I shall treat the rule as INVALID on the presumption that this proposal > > > >will > > > >pass unless it doesn't look like it will pass. > > > > > > Something curious about this proposal in that he will still be eligible for > > > another week. > > > > How so? > > Proposal 180:A doesn't explicitly adjust Karl's eligibility. However, I > think that Regular Ordinance #4 automatically does so; it doesn't care > whether a rule became invalid via judgement, timeout, or overrule proposal. Yes; this is the case. The Judge -- Rule Date: 2002-04-03 07:27:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST