Re: 169:A (more) (fwd)

From: Anton Cox (
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 09:26:41 PDT

On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Anton Cox wrote:

> I was taking the view that "what was going on" was those events that I
> could be expected to detect (ie concrete actions), as opposed to 'abstract'
> properties that later turn out to affect the game.

I dont know if I expressed myself very cleary, so let me just add that
- as we were told that having the board would thus allow us to follow
what is going on - I am interpreting this to mean that we know what is
going on insofar as it is an event taking place on the board. I hope
this makes it clearer what I mean by "concrete" (and why I think one
can interpret "what" as I have described).


Rule Date: 2001-10-03 16:25:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST