From: Anton Cox (A.G.Cox_at_city.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 09:26:41 PDT
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Anton Cox wrote: > I was taking the view that "what was going on" was those events that I > could be expected to detect (ie concrete actions), as opposed to 'abstract' > properties that later turn out to affect the game. I dont know if I expressed myself very cleary, so let me just add that - as we were told that having the board would thus allow us to follow what is going on - I am interpreting this to mean that we know what is going on insofar as it is an event taking place on the board. I hope this makes it clearer what I mean by "concrete" (and why I think one can interpret "what" as I have described). Anton -- Rule Date: 2001-10-03 16:25:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST