Re: 165:A

From: whit heaton (x40_at_pacbell.net)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 23:38:24 PDT

• Next message: Gallivanting Tripper: "169:A"
• Previous message: Aron Wall: "165:A"
• In reply to: Aron Wall: "165:A"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 165:A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I vote for this proposal.

Aron Wall wrote:

>
> -----165:A-------
> That the rule which the Judge has re-labeled 165:17 but whose author labeled it 165:16
> be declared VALID.
> ----------------
>

--
Rule Date: 2001-10-03 06:38:38 GMT

• Next message: Gallivanting Tripper: "169:A"
• Previous message: Aron Wall: "165:A"
• In reply to: Aron Wall: "165:A"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 165:A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST