From: Alan Riddell (pkpeekee_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 17 2001 - 12:35:26 PST
>---- >Alternate rules shall praise something, as I now laud how useful water is. >---- The prvious submission to the list was, >From: "Alan Riddell" <pkpeekee_at_hotmail.com> >To: frc_at_trolltech.com >Subject: 173:4 INVALID Style, -1.0 >Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:18:30 +0000 > >>From: "Karl Low" <gurugreat_at_hotmail.com> >>To: frc_at_trolltech.com >>Subject: Next committee regulation >>Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 07:42:25 +0000 >> >>Further valid postings will contain colours. >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. >>http://www.hotmail.com >> >>-- >>Rule Date: 2001-12-17 07:42:40 GMT > >Argh... Though I had replied to this already (probably just hit reply and >forgot to change the address...) Anyway I have taken this to be a rule >which >I have judged to be invalid as it contains the word "valid" that was >contained in the message previous to it. > >Alan "Peekee" Riddell > >_________________________________________________________________ >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > >-- >Rule Date: 2001-12-17 19:19:05 GMT The rule contains the word "I" as does the quoted submission, as such the rule is invalid as it does not meet the condition of 173:1 Essentiallt I like the use of the word laud apart from that the rule looses out for being invalid, and being slightly unclear on the fact that it is supposed to be a rule for this round style -0.5 Alan "Peekee" Riddell _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. -- Rule Date: 2001-12-17 20:35:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST