Reply-To (was Re: Proving a point)

From: Stephen Turner (
Date: Mon Dec 17 2001 - 01:15:25 PST

On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Ed Murphy wrote:

> cheep cheep [etc.]

Ugh! At least the message which made my rule valid was a proper message.

I was serious about suggesting the Reply-To: list header, by the way.
Without it, you have to manually edit the headers in order to reply to the
list only, which is the thing you most often want to do. Does anyone else
have a view on this?

Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01

Rule Date: 2001-12-17 09:15:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST