From: Alan Riddell (pkpeekee_at_hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Dec 16 2001 - 08:14:23 PST
>From: Stephen Turner <sret1_at_ntlworld.com> >To: Fantasy Rules Committee <frc_at_trolltech.com> >Subject: 173:2 >Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 13:10:50 +0000 (GMT) > > >>>>> >No subsequent rule shall contain any word more than once. ><<<<< VALID, Style +1.5 The immediately previous submission to the FRC list was, ======== On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Glenn Overby II wrote: >It looks like Alan meant to send this to the list and not to me. > Great, we're under way! Maybe this list should have a reply-to list header? Although I know that this suggestion usually causes a flamewar. Here are both sides of the argument: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01 -- Rule Date: 2001-12-16 13:08:07 GMT ========= I will take it to be the case that the Rule Date stamp, the From and Reply-to fields and other such areas of the message are not part of the actual "submission". The Rule then meets the requirements of 173:1 and contains no contradictions with itself, as such it is valid. Short simple and an appropriate amount of restiction for this point in the round. Style +1.5 Alan "Peekee" Riddell _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- Rule Date: 2001-12-16 16:14:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST