Re: 167:21

From: Jeremy D. Selengut (selengut_at_nih.gov)
Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 05:52:40 PDT

• Next message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:21, VALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:21"
• In reply to: Karl Low: "167:21"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>As the last rule I attempted ran afoul of rule one, I figured it would be
>appropriate to use rules 167:1 and 167:16 for creating this good one.
>Since our judge has indicated he doesn't like patents either, each player
>can only have one patented phrase. Also, each future rule will explicitly
>include its genetic sequence.

Rule Date: 2001-08-28 02:38:07 GMT


Karl, unfortunately, since your INVALID rule 167:20 reduced your
eligibility by one day, your eligibility expired on Aug 27, 18:20:23.  Your
rule was about 8 hours late, I'm afraid...

-TWJ

--
Rule Date: 2001-08-28 12:53:40 GMT

• Next message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:21, VALID, +2.0"
• Previous message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:21"
• In reply to: Karl Low: "167:21"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST