From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2001 - 08:29:31 PDT
Jeremy D. Selengut wrote: > > Judgement: VALID. Does this rule "splice in exactly half of any patented > phrase that appeared in the rule previous"? The problem is the word > "exactly". The phrase in question has 18 words, 10 of which are found in > this rule. 10? I thought I'd only used 9. (I wasn't at all worried about those I used multiple times.) Shoot! I missed "than". I was definitely thinking that I was only allowed to use 9 of them; allowing others to have been present without splicing weakens the above restriction significantly, but I suppose it is a reasonable interpretation. I'm still disappointed in myself for missing one. -Jesse -- Rule Date: 2001-08-22 15:29:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST