The first one in

From: David L. Lerner (dell2100_at_prodigy.net)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 09:39:36 PDT

• Next message: Jesse W: "167: 1, 2 or maybe even 3"
• Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Rule 167:1"
• Next in thread: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:3 VALID +0.5"
• Reply: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:3 VALID +0.5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

The First One In

|It's useful to remember that| many Companies, universities, And Governments have rushed into Biotechnology, before They've even explored the potential risks and dangers.  In accordance, we do not need Rule 167:1 to start creating rules.



Thank you
 
David L. Lerner
dell2100_at_prodigy.net
Often, the most striking and innovative solutions come from realizing that your concept of the problem was wrong.
Eric Steven Raymond



--
Rule Date: 2001-08-20 16:40:52 GMT

• Next message: Jesse W: "167: 1, 2 or maybe even 3"
• Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Rule 167:1"
• Next in thread: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:3 VALID +0.5"
• Reply: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:3 VALID +0.5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST