Re: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)

From: David Nicol (davidnicol_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Jan 25 2005 - 20:39:05 PST

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Previous message: Ed Murphy: "RE: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• In reply to: Ed Murphy: "RE: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

we now have two rules 231:4.  Please advise.


-- 
David L Nicol
Communication is neither obvious nor inscrutable.

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Previous message: Ed Murphy: "RE: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• In reply to: Ed Murphy: "RE: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST