From: David Nicol (davidnicol_at_gmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 04 2005 - 17:57:55 PST
Bravo! (clap, clap, clap) On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 21:37:03 +0100 (CET), Aron Wall <aron_at_wall.org> wrote: > Rule 232:2: > -------------------------------- > WHEREAS we are all Enjoined by Noble Destiny to all continue to Confuse > the Judge, allow for the possibility of Delicious Paradoxes, and even > Prevent the Proliferation of Infantile Rules which barely cause anyone > to think, and Especially Considering my Dignity as the President of the > United States Elect, and after consulting numerous Lawyers for their > Scholarly and Well Informed Opinions, I Strongly and Wholeheartedly > suggest (and Mandate) the following Restriction: > > That no Rule shall be Valid if it is Obviously Valid, unless it is the > first Rule of the Round, in Which Case it shall be > Grandfatherclausedified. > > That Furthermore in Light of the Esteemed Intellegence and Wisdom and > Flattery-Resistance of the Judge, that no Particular Cause of a Rule > being Unobviously Valid shall be Acceptable by itself as a Means of > Unobvious Validity, Seeing as the Judge is Hereby Supposed (with penalty > of Death to any Impudent Person who Explicitly says Otherwise, in Which > State of Death no one may Post any Valid Rules until the General > Resurrection at the End Of Time following Various Apocolyptic Happenings > which no Mortal knows the Times nor Dates thereof) to be Most Capable > through Experience of Finding any Old Cause of Unobvious Validity to be > instead Obvious, so that the same needs be either Avoided or else > Combined with some New Cause of Unobviousness of Validity. > ----------------------------------- > Aron Wall > > -- David L Nicol Communication is neither obvious nor inscrutable.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST