Judgement 234:12 INVALID +0.9 Style

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Sun Apr 10 2005 - 13:39:54 PDT


Ed Murphy wrote:

> This rule is the ninth valid rule of this round.
>
> The tenth valid rule of this round shall explain how Hamlet cured
> himself of triskaidekaphobia, and what Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
> had to say about it.
>
> The tenth valid rule of this round shall also be the last valid
> rule of this round.  If Quazie actually manages to write it, then
> e deserves to win!

Suppose that this rule is the tenth rule of the round, because 234:6 is
not a rule and 234:11 is judged to come after.  Then as the tenth rule
it is required to explain how to satisfy 234:3.  This it does not do.
INVALID.

Suppose that this rule is the eleventh rule of the round, because 234:6
is not a rule and 234:11 is judged to have come after it.  Then this
rule does not include 4 words with the letter "q" in them.  Nor does it
do everything which the TVRotR must do, as required by 234:10.  INVALID.

Suppose that this is the twelfth rule of the round, because the Judge in
his mercy decides to count the restrictions on the Nth rule as applying
to the index number rather than to the actual order of the rule.  Then
there is just one slight problem--that if it were valid it would be the
*eighth* valid rule, not the ninth.  INVALID.

+1 Style for Magnanimity.
-0.1 Style for inability to count.

Total +0.9 Style


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST