Judgement 234:8 VALID -0.5 Style

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Fri Apr 08 2005 - 11:03:08 PDT

• Next message: David Nicol: "Re: 234:6"
• Previous message: Quazie: "234:8 No dancing this time."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I wrote:

> Quazie wrote:
>
> > The tenth valid rule of this round shall be valid.
>
> This rule has no logical content whatsoever--it is strictly
> tautological.  As no prior valid rule has restricted any rules besides
> the theme rule, this is VALID.
>
> Having no content at all is a bad thing.  Perhaps at some meta-level
> this might give style points for boldness.  But I don't think a last
> ditch effort to avoid ineligibilty quite counts.  I'm going to give you
> take away your last half-style point for this, therefore.  I am
> mitigating this to some degree since I would like to see a tenth valid
> rule.
>
> Aron Wall

• Next message: David Nicol: "Re: 234:6"
• Previous message: Quazie: "234:8 No dancing this time."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST