Re: Judgement 234:5 VALID -0.1

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Thu Apr 07 2005 - 08:58:54 PDT


Same issue as above.  But since I ruled this one VALID, timeout doesn't
change anything.

Aron Wall wrote:

> Ed Murphy wrote:
>
> > The tenth valid rule of this round shall explain the significance
> > of the following:
> >
> > one     two     three   four
> >          five            six
> > sev     en      eight   nine
> >          ten             e
> > lev     en      twelve
>
> Valid.  But how hard is that? -1/10.
>
> Aron Wall


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST