Re: 226:1 -- valid

From: david nicol (whatever_at_davidnicol.com)
Date: Wed Jul 28 2004 - 18:36:40 PDT

Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Well nobody wanted to get to yes. Has this happened before?"
Previous message: Ed Murphy: "226:1"
In reply to: Ed Murphy: "226:1"
Next in thread: david nicol: "Ed Murphy, the only participant, has won round 226."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 23:15, Ed Murphy wrote:


Looks like a good start. 226:1 is valid and Ed is
eligible until tuesday.

General participation expires Monday.



It is interesting that the play restriction in 226:1 only 
appears to apply to the next play, instead of being a
general restriction.

Two tentative style points. (I will defer to Karl Low's
style scoring if he wishes to take on style point judging.)

Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Well nobody wanted to get to yes. Has this happened before?"
Previous message: Ed Murphy: "226:1"
In reply to: Ed Murphy: "226:1"
Next in thread: david nicol: "Ed Murphy, the only participant, has won round 226."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST