From: david (whatever_at_davidnicol.com)
Date: Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:02:37 PST
on the other hand, I am fairly certain that those postings would be fall within definitions of "identical" applicable to copyright law. I don't think "later drafts of the same work" are widely considered to be "non-identical derivative works" although that is what they become when one uses RSH's "identical" Do we have any IP lawyers on the list any more? > Richard S. Holmes wrote: > >>To call two postings >>identical when one has been edited for grammar, word choice, and >>punctuation over-strains the word "identical". >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST