From: David Nicol (davidnicol_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Dec 21 2004 - 12:01:09 PST
if this was phrased as a fantasy rule, i could judge it valid, but it's still phrased as a modification to the ROs. I'm not sure how play in 230 could continue after its declared validity, either. What fantasy rule submission could be inconsistent with a declaration about what the Judge does? Fantasy rules concern the substance of future fantasy rules of the current round, not the ROs. You get to restruct play in the rest of the current round. Invalid. Bor may play until 26 Dec. No style points. Open participation continues, the general clock will start at the submission of the first valid FR. The theme continues to be "ANARCHY NOW." ( I'm hoping for some prose about a plot to bomb the corporate offices of Monsanto, or Def Jam, or something like that, I will of course settle for what I get.) On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:30:42 +0100 (CET), Bor Onx <boronx_at_yahoo.com> wrote: > Proposal 230:1 > > For the duration of round 230, replace Regular > Ordinance 6. (not including 6a or 6b) with the > following Regular Ordinance > > 6. Judge. The Judge is responsible for interpreting > the ordinances and determining the validity of fantasy > rules. If a fantasy rule is consistent with itself, > previously posted valid fantasy rules, or the regular > ordinances, then the Judge shall declare that rule > invalid or unsuccesful, otherwise e shall declare it valid. -- David L Nicol Holiday reminder: chocolate is poisonous to dogs.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST