From: Stephen Turner (sret1_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: Thu Dec 16 2004 - 11:53:13 PST
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Rich Holmes wrote: > > And since it is the rules of a different round, not the rules of this > round nor the ROs, that are being inaccurately described, there is no > validity-affecting inconsistency. > I'd like to point out that there are no fantasy rules from previous rounds. They are all repealed at the end of the round. Therefore I would take the restriction to be restricting an empty set, which would certainly mean that there was no inconsistency. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "Low Priced Cambridge Clare College. Big selection at eBay UK!" (Ad after Google search for Clare College Cambridge)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST