From: Bryan Donlan (bdonlan_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 11 2004 - 16:16:05 PST
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 17:18:42 +0100 (CET), Chuck Carroll <frc_at_chuckcarroll.org> wrote: > > >> >Places restrictions on a past round (221). INVALID. > >> > >> Why would that invalidate the rule? > > > >I was under the impression that rules must not place restrictions on > >any other rounds. Is this wrong? > > I don't see anything in the ROs about that. Point. I change my ruling to: VALID +1.0 Follows theme -1.0 Discourages originality ---- +0.0 Total Round 229: innuendo (All times are UTC) Player Eligible until Style ---------------------------------------------------------------------- David Nicol (13 Dec 2004 22:01) 0 James Willson (14 Dec 2004 03:26) 1.5 Everyone else (13 Dec 2004 22:01) 0 -- bd
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST