223:X-3

From: Joshua (joshua_at_bearsend.ca)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 10:36:55 PDT


 --- MAILER-DAEMON_at_yahoo.com wrote: > Date: 28 Apr 2004 17:04:39 -0000
> From: MAILER-DAEMON_at_yahoo.com
> To: j3b4_at_yahoo.com
> Subject: failure delivery

>  --- David Nicol <davidnicol_at_pay2send.com> wrote: > 
> > Joshua's entry may be considered VALID.  There is enough use of the
> > present tense to indicate past events that considering the
> > distinction material is silly.
> > 
> 
> Oh the irony!  I am very pleased to be given this second chance and
> feel moved to respond with one more rule but I find myself in
> backpacker-land logging in from internet Cafe's in Bankok and
> Kathmandu
> with scarecly enough energy to spam my immediate family much less
> compose a coherent and valid rule.
> 
> But that doesn't mean I wont try.
> 
> Klaus aparently achieved enlightenment while doodling in the margins
> of
> the anti-gravity device specification sheet. His drawing on page 23
> of
> part four of the specification which requires that all interfaces for
> the anti-grav be written in sanskrit (given that it was the most
> universally incomprehensible of dead languages and thus least
> susceptible to lexical drift), coincidentally, when combined with
> figure 17 (the interface design itself), formed a perfect (albiet
> monochrome) reproduction of the lost mandala of Terrence Testaburger
> -
> a short lived reincarnation of a Tibetan Llama who disappeared
> mysteriously last week.  
> 
> This may seem strange but things like this happen every week.  In
> fact
> every previous rule which contains a specification for Tesla's
> anti-gravity device also contains an equally absurd non-sequiter. 
> 


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST