From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 21:45:39 PDT
Renumbered from 216:04 to 216:05. On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Bill Maciejewski wrote: > ---- begin 216:4 ---- > Even if Arnt paid the power bill, the guy at the utility company could > still turn it off without your permission. Therefore he holds a higher > power. > > All subsequent rules must name a higher power than the one in the > previous valid rule, and furthermore, that entity must not be one that > has been named before. > ---- end 216:4 ---- > -bill Validity: Proves Arnt Gulbrandsen from 216:01, Richard S. Holmes from 216:03, and Arnt Gulbrandsen from 216:04 all wrong by providing a higher power, that of control of the power at the utility company. Rule is VALID. Style: Still continuing to build upon the theme. The restriction adds a nice small twist to the Round. +1.50 -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST