Re: 216:10 INVALID +1.25

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (arnt_at_oryx.com)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 10:32:17 PDT


Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> None of the Rules so far in this round require transitivity.

In further support of this, I note that e.g. Congress has no power of me 
or over the guy from the utility company. This did not prevent 216:8 
from being valid, since Congress _does_ have power over Verisign.

---Arnt


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST