Re: Round 216

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (arnt_at_oryx.com)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 05:07:32 PDT

• Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 216:04 VALID +1.00"
• Previous message: Andre Engels: "Re: Round 216"
• In reply to: Andre Engels: "Re: Round 216"
• Next in thread: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "216:01 VALID +1.50"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Andre Engels writes:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>> So, how about making yourself eligible, so to speak? Shouldn't be too hard.
>
> I already am. I have played many rounds ago, and since then have not 
> specified

Well, that was engels_at_whatever dot nl, not engels_at_whatever dot de! Err 
on the side of safety - post a rule now! And make it a valid one. 
You'll do a good deed - you'll free the Oldest Newbie from possibly 
having to judge round 217.

--Arnt

• Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: 216:04 VALID +1.00"
• Previous message: Andre Engels: "Re: Round 216"
• In reply to: Andre Engels: "Re: Round 216"
• Next in thread: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "216:01 VALID +1.50"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST