From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (arnt_at_oryx.com)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 03:04:09 PDT
Arnt Gulbrandsen writes: > One really must hope that the Judge will make a fair-minded, neatly > elaborated decision. However, based on evidence of past rounds, the > Judge is more likely to be a corrupted by the posters of rules > 216:08, 216:09 or *nudge nudge wink wink* 216:10. Shit. That's what I get for writing in a hurry. But I'll argue that it's OK: If the Judge makes neatly elaborated decisions, surely that shows that the Judge himself is neat. --Arnt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST