Re: Round 209:Rule 1 -- VALID, +2.0

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 12:14:32 PDT


Karl Low <kwil_at_gmx.net> writes:

> Oh sure, and you probably expect that all rules mean the opposite of what 
> they say.
> 
> -- 
> Rule Date: 2003-05-21 18:02:30 GMT

Validity: No problems.

Style: Well, what exactly is this rule saying?  Is it imposing a
restriction that "all rules mean the opposite of what they say"?
Can't be: the Epimenides paradox would rear its ugly head.  Nor can it
be consistently interpreted as imposing a restriction that "no rules
mean the opposite of what they say".

If this rule imposes a restriction, it certainly isn't one of the
above two.  And perhaps it imposes none at all, but simply makes an
assertion about someone's expectations.

Perhaps it will become more clear as time goes on.  +2.0.

-- 
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY
                  "We're waist deep in the Big Muddy
                   And the big fool says to push on." -- Pete Seeger

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-05-21 19:14:54 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST