From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Wed May 07 2003 - 09:59:34 PDT
This time to the list... Richard S. Holmes wrote: > > Since Proposal 207:B merely attempts to enact by override what has in > fact already occurred (and gets it slightly though inconsequentially > wrong), I vote AGAINST it, and recommend we simply get on with Round > 208, with Ed as Judge and Steve as Wizard. My thoughts exactly. I also vote AGAINST. -Jesse -- Rule Date: 2003-05-07 16:59:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST