From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:31:22 PST
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu wrote: > I. No valid Rule may contain the seventeenth, twentyfourth, or 26th letters > of the alphabet. > > II. All Rules whose number is 0 modulo three take precedence over all other > Rules; within those two groups, the lower numbered rule takes precedence. VALIDITY: 205:2 No more than half the statements in the rule are claims of precedence -- OK. 205:3 Tries to determine every possible case of precedence -- OOPS. 205:5 is INVALID (regardless of whether 205:A passes). STYLE for 205:5 +0.5 for being on theme. -0.5 for boring syntactic restriction in I. +0.5 for interesting precedence claim in II. ---- +0.5 total -- Steve Gardner | School of Computer Science | I've only just realized and Software Engineering | how self-conscious I am. gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au | -- Rule Date: 2003-03-21 03:31:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST